Get posts by email or add your own views 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 Handy Links
BBC Iraq coverage |
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
UP THE HILLS AND DOWN THE VALLEY: Peter Hill, the Daily Express editor, claims that the shifting of the paper's support behind the Tories is down to him and him alone. Oddly, though, when asked why on 'Today', he started his answer "I think that it's because..." And did he ever squirm when asked if the porntastic Richard Desmond supported or agreed with him. Didn't answer, just squirmed. Peter Hill, of course, has the almost unique distinction of editing a newspaper reported to the Press Complaints Commission by its own journalists. Perhaps now it's no longer getting support from the paper, Labour might stop dancing to its racist demands on asylum seekers. Friday, April 16, 2004
CRB FOUL-UP: And what, exactly, is the comfort you're meant to take from being refused a job because you've been labelled a criminal in being told you're one of a "small percentage" of fuck-ups? And since when has getting on for four mistakes a week been the sort of thing we're meant to write off? Wonder if one of the 193 wrongly labelled people will be bringing a libel action against the CRB? Wednesday, April 14, 2004
WE DID SAY WE WERE OCCASIONAL: But we were surprised to hear President Bush in what must have been an unscripted performance on Sunday (nobody would write so many 'ums', would they?) expressing his shock that people were trying to use violence to determine the future of Iraq. It must be a major slap in the face to him after all his attempts to use negotiation and encouragement to bring about a regime change in Baghdad. We were also a little surprised that the White House is still pushing the line that the opposition in Iraq is coming from "terrorists." Because if it's the case that Falluja was being ransacked by terrorists, should we take the negotiation of a ceasefire with these people as an indication that the US is quite happy to do deals with Al Qaeda? Unless, of course, they're not Al Qaeda at all, and the American government is lying when it tries to pretend they are? But that would be unthinkable, wouldn't it? ACTIVE POLITICS: We like the sound of the Acid Rain Retirement Fund, a practical response to the concept that companies can buy the right to pollute the planet. They're raising money to buy up pollution quota, and simply let it expire. |