something of the night

Get posts by email or add your own views
No Rock & Roll Fun
the colour supplement
bothsidesnow

mail us stuff



Handy Links

BBC Iraq coverage
Guardian Unlimited Iraq coverage
White House news
In These Times
NY Times Iraq
New Scientist Iraq conflict reports
Stop the War
IndyMedia - UK
Get Your War On
Google News: Latest Iraq stories
Ted Mills blog
GWBush.com
Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
Guardian Online War Special
Comprehensive listing of anti-war sites
Bush Lied... Yahoo Group


Powered By Blogger TM   



Thursday, June 09, 2005
 
AND WHILE WE'RE AT IT...: Norvell's big beef is the way the BBC covered the Glazer story - he (wrongly, actually) suggests that coverage "...continues to portray the takeover as an effort by a rogue financier with a funny beard and no heart, who wants to "take Manchester away from the people and into the hands of market forces." Never mind that Man U has been a public company for 14 years and, as one of the most valuable sports brands in the world, market forces are as much part of the team as red face paint and the smell of stale lager."

Meanwhile, there's this page of a popular newspaper, which depicts Glazer as a rogue financier with a funny beard who wants to take Manchester away from the people and into the hands of market forces. Who could take such a lefty view as that? Erm... that would be Fox News' sister paper, the Sun.
(0) comments
 
FOX NEWS This piece from Scott Norvell is a pretty standard piece of selective BBC-kicking - he praises Biased BBC's watch on the "ideological slants" of the Corporation, although not pointing out they only look for a slant in one direction, but that's not to unexpected. What is fascinating is the following, bearing in mind that Scott is the London bureau chief of Fox News:

"Fox News is, after all, a private channel and our presenters are quite open about where they stand on particular stories. That's our appeal. People watch us because they know what they are getting."

But... isn't Fox News meant to be "fair and balanced"? Don't they keep repeating the mantra "We report... you decide"? Isn't the whole basis of Fox meant to be that it's a source of news free from the sort of taint you get in other reporting outlets - and yet, here's a senior employee of the station admitting that, actually, it's a one-sided ideofest after all.
(0) comments